The paper discusses various views on the concept of deception and abuse of trust as a means of committing a crime under article 165 of the criminal code. The ambiguity in the distinction between these methods lead to different understanding of their essence, a matter of controversy not only among the representatives of the science of criminal law, but also practitioners. To avoid contradictions in the understanding of the signs of cheating and breach of trust, and errors in the classification being considered a crime, it is proposed to define these methods for the purposes of article 165 of the criminal code of the Russian Federation in decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from December, 27th, 2007 n 51 «About court practice on Affairs about swindle, assignment and waste».
crimes against property, causing property damage by deceit and abuse of trust, the means of committing a crime, cheating, breach of trust
1. Sostoyanie prestupnosti za yanvar'-dekabr' 2010-2016 goda // Statistika i analitika MVD RF. URL: https://mvd.ru/ (data obrascheniya: 01.04.2017).
2. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 27 dekabrya 2007 g. № 51// Sprav.- pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 01.04.2017).
3. Postanovlenie Abinskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 14 oktyabrya 2013 goda №1-263/2013 g. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-abinskij-rajonnyj-sud-krasnodarskij-kraj-s/act-457012742/
4. Postanovlenie Voskresenskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 14 aprelya 2011 goda. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-voskresenskij-gorodskoj-sud-moskovskaya-oblast-s/act-104570105/
5. Postanovlenie mirovogo sud'i sudebnogo uchastka №3 Severobaykal'stkogo rayona Respubliki Buryatiya ot 17 yanvarya 2011 goda. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-sudebnyj-uchastok-3-severobajkalskogo-rajona-s/act-216935152/
6. Sycheva N.V. Prichinenie imuschestvennogo uscherba putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem : ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty (Po materialam Ural'skogo federal'nogo okruga) : avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.08. Chelyabinsk, 2006. 26 s.
7. Poznyshev S.V. Ocherk osnovnyh nachal nauki ugolovnogo prava: T. 2. Osobennaya chast'. M., 1923.
8. Mihaylov K.V. Zloupotreblenie doveriem kak priznak prestupleniy protiv sobstvennosti (ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty) : dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. Chelyabinsk, 2000.
9. Stepanov Yu.I. Ugolovno-pravovaya harakteristika obmana kak priznaka prestupleniy v sfere ekonomiki : dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. SPb., 2001.
10. Shhagapsoev Z.L. Problemy kvalifikacii prestupleniy protiv sobstvennosti, sovershaemyh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem // Obschestvo i pravo. Krasnodar : Izd-vo Krasnodar. un-ta MVD Rossii, 2009. № 3 (25).
11. Krasnoperov E.V. Razgranichenie obmana i zloupotrebleniya doveriem v sostavah prestupleniy protiv sobstvennosti // Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU. 2012. №84(10).
12. Borzenkov G.N. Razgranichenie obmana i zloupotreblenie doveriem // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008. № 5.
13. Rozencvayg A.I. K voprosu o konstrukcii sostava «zloupotreblenie doveriem» v glave 21 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatischeva. 2012. № 2 (76).
14. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka : 80000 slov i frazeologicheskih vyrazheniy / Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka im. Vinogradova. 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. M. : OOO «A TEMP». 2013.
15. Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: sovremennoe napisanie. V 4 t. T.2. M. : Astrel' : Tranzitkniga. 2006.
