Introduction: the paper is devoted to the analysis of standards of the existing criminal procedure legislation regulating use of norms of the Criminal code of Russia in the course of criminal proceeding after removal of the first instance of a sentence by court. Materials and Methods: the integration of materials of published judiciary practice, as well as a method of comparative analysis of legal rules governing the ability to change qualification after the court verdict were applied. Results: the features of change of qualification in appeal and cassation manufacture and other postcoding stages in a criminal case are shown. The contradictions and insufficiency of the legal regulation of grounds for changing the verdict in the appellate and cassation criminal proceedings were revealed. Discussion and Conclusions: the change of qualification is a guarantee of the rights and legitimate interests of individuals in criminal proceedings. The correction of mistakes made by the court of first instance, aimed at achieving the goals of criminal justice and its purpose, specified in Аrticle 6 of the Code of criminal procedure.
criminal case, miscarriage of justice, qualification of a crime, charge, judicial stages, change of charge and qualification, appeal production, cassation production, new and newly discovered facts, international cooperation
1. Epihin A.Yu., Burganov B.R. Mezhotraslevye problemy realizacii instituta preyudicii v sovremennom rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2016. T. 158. № 2. S. 596 - 604.
2. Epihin A.Yu. Mezhotraslevye problemy kvalifikacii nezakonnogo ponuzhdeniya k dache pokazaniy (st. 302 UK RF) // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. 2015. № 4 (34). S. 86 - 90.
3. Epihin A.Yu. Mezhotraslevye problemy kvalifikacii sostava prestupleniya zavedomo lozhnyh pokazaniy, zaklyucheniya eksperta, specialista ili nepravil'nogo perevoda // Politicheskie, ekonomicheskie i sociokul'turnye aspekty regional'nogo upravleniya na evropeyskom Severe: materialy Itogovoy (trinadcatoy) Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Syktyvkar, 2014. S. 89 - 96.
4. Smirnov D.V. Uhudshenie polozheniya osuzhdennogo v sude apellyacionnoy instancii // Zakonnost'. 2015. № 2. S. 37 - 38.
5. Chekmaeva N.V. O vozmozhnyh putyah razresheniya nekotoryh problem, voznikayuschih pri primenenii glavy 45.1 UPK RF // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2014. № 1. S. 10 - 13; ona zhe // EZh-Yurist. 2014. № 3. S. 1, 6.
6. Epihin A.Yu. Otmena srokov obzhalovaniya vstupivshego v zakonnuyu silu prigovora // Aktual'nye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki: sbornik materialov V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy Dnyu yurista. Cheboksary, 2015. S. 427 - 432.
7. Potapov V.D. Shirokaya svoboda obzhalovaniya v sudah apellyacionnoy, kassacionnoy i nadzornoy instanciy v redakcii Federal'nogo zakona ot 29 dekabrya 2010 goda № 433-FZ // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. № 5. S. 4 - 6.
8. Potapov V.D. Kassacionnoe i nadzornoe proizvodstvo: obschee i osobennoe v kontekste zakonodatel'nyh novell ot 29 dekabrya 2010 g. // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. № 2. S. 99 - 102.
9. Smirnov A.V. Reforma poryadka peresmotra sudebnyh resheniy po ugolovnym delam: nadzor // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». 2011. (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2017).
