A REVIEW OF THE SENTENCE PRONOUNCED BY THE COURT IN A SPECIAL MANNER IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONCLUSION OF PRETRIAL AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION
Rubrics: MAIN RUBRIC
Authors:
1.
the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in the Republic of Tatarstan
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 260
to 263
Status:
Published
Received:
12.06.2018
Accepted:
20.06.2018
Published:
25.06.2018
Subject area:
UDK 343.15 Приговор и обжалование. Судебное убеждение и свободная оценка доказательств
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve, peresmotr prigovora, vnov' otkryvshiesya obstoyatel'stva, kassacionnoe predstavlenie prokurora
Abstract (English):
Introduction: the article deals with topical issues of the revision of the sentence decided by the court in a special order in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement. Materials and Methods: the study used the following methods: logical and legal, comparative legal, statistical data processing, generalization of judicial and investigative practice. Results: the study showed that the mechanism of review of the sentence imposed in a special manner in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement is imperfect, since the consequences provided for in the law in case of violation of the terms of the pre-trial cooperation agreement is difficult to apply in practice. Discussion and Conclusions: recommendations are put forward to improve the legislation and law enforcement practice of reviewing sentences decided in a special way in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement
Introduction: the article deals with topical issues of the revision of the sentence decided by the court in a special order in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement. Materials and Methods: the study used the following methods: logical and legal, comparative legal, statistical data processing, generalization of judicial and investigative practice. Results: the study showed that the mechanism of review of the sentence imposed in a special manner in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement is imperfect, since the consequences provided for in the law in case of violation of the terms of the pre-trial cooperation agreement is difficult to apply in practice. Discussion and Conclusions: recommendations are put forward to improve the legislation and law enforcement practice of reviewing sentences decided in a special way in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement
Keywords:
dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve, peresmotr prigovora, vnov' otkryvshiesya obstoyatel'stva, kassacionnoe predstavlenie prokurora
dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve, peresmotr prigovora, vnov' otkryvshiesya obstoyatel'stva, kassacionnoe predstavlenie prokurora
1. Zhukov G.K. Al'ternativnye sposoby peresmotra prigovorov v otnoshenii lic, zaklyuchivshih dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Prokuror. 2017. № 3. S. 134-139.
