Introduction: the article discusses the changes in the Russian legislation, providing for the regulation of local issues in the field of land relations. The consequences of the Federal Law “On Amendments to Art. 26.3 of the Federal Law "On General Principles of Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive State Authorities of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation" and the Federal Law "On general principles of organization of local government in the Russian Federation N 136-FZ” in connection with the redistribution of powers between local authorities and bodies of state power of a subject of the Russian Federation. Materials and Methods: the materials of the study were the norms of Russian legislation regulating the list of issues of local importance of municipalities, scientific publications of researchers, as well as materials of judicial practice on the designated topic. When writing the article, we used logical, legal and other methods, in particular screening of normative sources. Results: the article analyzes changes in the legislation governing the issues of local importance in the field of land relations, presents the legal positions of researchers and jurisdictional bodies relating to the considered novels, gives the author's position on the solution of these issues. Discussion and Conclusions: the conclusions about the imperfection of the amendments to the Federal Law N 136-FZ are substantiated. The authors come to the conclusion that the addition of land legislation in the field of redistribution of powers between the local government body and public authorities will protect legitimate rights and interests of citizens.
voprosy mestnogo znacheniya, zemel'nye otnosheniya, organy mestnogo samoupravleniya, institut pereraspredeleniya polnomochiy
1. Zabolotskih E.M. Voprosy mestnogo znacheniya v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo Suda RF // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2017. № 3. S. 56 - 59.
2. Sbornik, posvyaschennyy pamyati Vladimira Fadeeva. Iz nauchnogo naslediya: raboty raznyh let. M.: Prospekt, 2015. Tom 1. 598 s.
3. Byalkina T.M. Konstitucionnyy princip samostoyatel'nosti mestnogo samoupravleniya v reshenii voprosov mestnogo znacheniya na sovremennom etape municipal'noy reformy // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 5. S. 69 - 73.
4. Kostyukov A.N., Blagov Yu.V. Konstitucionnost' municipal'noy reformy // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 6. S. 62 - 65;
5. Nanba S.B. Pereraspredelenie polnomochiy: sootnoshenie federal'nogo i regional'nogo regulirovaniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2016. № 6. S. 32 - 40;
6. Shugrina E.S. Novyy etap municipal'noy reformy ili kontrreformirovanie kontrreform? // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 4. S. 68 - 71.
7. Kozhevnikov O.A. Diskussionnye voprosy prava sub'ekta RF pereraspredelyat' polnomochiya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v pol'zu organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov RF cherez prizmu konstitucionno-pravovoy i ekonomicheskoy osnovy mestnogo samoupravleniya // Municipal'noe imuschestvo: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2016. № 1.
8. Bazhenova O.I. Sovremennye problemy organizacii municipal'noy vlasti v gorodskih okrugah: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 7. S. 54 - 66.
9. Peshin N.L. Novye tendencii municipal'noy reformy: pereraspredelenie polnomochiy mezhdu urovnyami publichnoy vlasti // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 12. S. 62 - 68.
10. Umerenko Yu.A. Tendencii razvitiya i nekotorye problemy zemel'nogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii na sovremennom etape // Imuschestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2016. № 7. S. 90 - 105.
