Moscow, Russian Federation
Introduction: the article presents the results of theoretical understanding of the procedural and public status of an investigator, some recommendations for the legislator, which can be used in the formation and implementation of criminal procedure policy in order to increase the credibility of the investigator. According to the author of the article, insufficient credibility of an investigator impedes the creation in society of the perception of justice in pre-trial proceedings, which makes it difficult to effectively implement the public function of criminal justice. Materials and Methods: the study is based on the method of materialistic dialectics. The question of increasing the credibility of an investigator is considered in conjunction with a number of other criminal procedural problems: the credibility of a judge, criminal procedural functions, functions of an investigator, and organization of pre-trial proceedings. In addition, general scientific methods were used: historical, sociological, formal-logical, analysis, synthesis, etc., as well as specific scientific methods: comparative-legal; formal legal, logical and legal etc. Results: credibility of an investigator in the society is an important factor in ensuring the publicity of criminal proceedings. The author suggests that an investigator must be seen by the population of the country as a highly professional, responsible, possessing necessary moral qualities, able to provide a legitimate and fair investigation in a criminal case. Discussion and Conclusions: investigator is an official performing the function of a justice nature, i.e. providing comprehensive, complete and objective investigation of the circumstances of a criminal case. In this regard, his credibility must be comparable to that of a judge and requires appropriate enforcement measures.
funkcii sledovatelya, avtoritet sledovatelya, processual'noe polozhenie sledovatelya, processual'naya samostoyatel'nost' sledovatelya, publichnost' ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva
1. Chetverikova A. Makaroshki po-russki // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2018. 21 dekabrya.
2. Vasil'ev O.L. Teoreticheskie aspekty deystviya principa spravedlivosti na dosudebnyh stadiyah rossiyskogo ugolovnogo processa: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M.: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni M.V. Lomonosova, 2018.
3. Borulenkov Yu.P. Sledstvennyy sud'ya kak «slaboe zveno» ugolovno-processual'nogo dokazyvaniya // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2015. № 3 (20).
4. Vlasova S.V. K voprosu o prisposablivaemosti ugolovno-processual'nogo mehanizma k cifrovoy real'nosti // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2018. № 1 (36).
5. Baev O.Ya. Sledovatel' (osnovy teorii i praktiki deyatel'nosti). M.: Prometey, 2017.
6. Rahunov R.D. Uchastniki ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nosti po sovetskomu pravu. M: Gosyurizdat, 1961.
7. Solov'ev A.B. Zakonnost' v dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo processa Rossii: monografiya / A.B. Solov'ev, M.E. Tokareva, A.G. Haliulin, N.A. Yakubovich. M.-Kemerovo, 1997.
8. Gulyaev A.P. Processual'nye funkcii sledovatelya: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Akademiya MVD Rossii, 1981.
9. Ulanov V.V. Soderzhanie processual'nyh funkciy sledovatelya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2008. № 17.
10. Pobedkin A.V., Erohina O.S. Sledovatel' v sudebnom zasedanii v hode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu. M.: Yurlitinform, 2017.
11. Averin A.V. Istina i sudebnaya dostovernost' (Postanovka problemy). 2-e izd., dop. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy centr Press», 2007.
12. Korotkih M.G. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. v Rossii (suschnost' i social'no-pravovoy mehanizm formirovaniya) // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyy process. 2014. № 3.
13. Shishkov A.A. Organy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v sisteme gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Aktual'nye problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya i doznaniya v sovremennyh usloviyah razvitiya ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Moya professiya - sledovatel': sb. statey po itogam mezhvedomstvennoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 19 aprelya 2018 g. M.: MosU MVD Rossii imeni V.Ya. Kikotya. 2018.
14. Kulikov V. Yashmanov B. Glavnyy po arestam. Sledstvennye sud'i zaschityat ot nezakonnyh del // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2015. 12 marta.
15. Brazol' B.L. Ocherki po sledstvennoy chasti. Pg., 1916.
16. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo X-XX vekov v 9 t. Tom 8. Sudebnaya reforma / O.I. Chistyakov i dr.; otv. red. B.V. Vilenskiy. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1991.
17. Golovko L.V. Reforma policii v kontekste modernizacii predvaritel'nogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe // Ugolovnaya yusticiya: svyaz' vremen: izbrannye materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii (Sankt-Peterburg, 6-8 oktyabrya 2010 g.) / sost. A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy. M., 2012.
18. Buckovskiy N. O deyatel'nosti prokurorskogo nadzora vsledstvie otdeleniya obvinitel'noy vlasti ot sudebnoy. SPb, 1867.
19. Kozlova N. V SK prodolzhayutsya meropriyatiya, napravlennye na rost chisla sledovateley // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2019. 2 fevralya.
20. Gavrilov B.Ya. O nekotoryh problemnyh voprosah ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii // Yuridicheskiy konsul'tant. 2002. № 1 (97).
21. Ogorodov A.N. Realizaciya sledovatelem processual'noy samostoyatel'nosti // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika. 2016. № 3 (37).
